SuccessfulSoftwareProjects.com

Many enterprise class Commercial-Off-The-Shelf (COTS) Software projects frequently fail or end in delivering sub-optimal organizational solutions due to a variety of reasons. Many of which are interrelated or a combination of factors rather than a specific single reason.

​

However, utilizing tools such as Lean Six Sigma's Ishikawa/Root Cause Analysis the single primary determinant or common variable of project success or failure is Inexperience/Lack of Expertise. Both in how projects are staffed/resourced utilizing  internal organizational resources and externally resourced implementation partner resources. Projects staffed without internal and external Subject Matter Experts (SME's) amplifies project execution and delivery risk and are destined for failure.

​

Common Reasons for Project Failure:

​​​​​​​​

1. Poor Planning and Scope Creep

• Unclear Requirements: When project requirements aren’t clearly defined from the start, the project can quickly go off track. 

• Scope Creep: As the project progresses, new features or changes may be introduced, expanding the scope without proper adjustments in resources, time, or budget. This leads to missed deadlines and a product that is less focused.

​​

2. Lack of Stakeholder Involvement

• Misalignment with Business Goals: If the implementation team isn’t consistently communicating with stakeholders or understanding the business objectives, the project may not deliver the desired value.

• Infrequent Feedback: Failure to engage with users and stakeholders early and often can lead to a mismatch between the final product and what end users truly need.

​​

3. Inadequate Resource Allocation

• Underestimation of Time and Budget: Many projects are started without a clear understanding of how much time, money, or manpower will be required, leading to underfunding or rushed timelines.

• Overloading the Team: Without proper resources, whether human, technological, or financial, projects are often set up for failure. Teams might be overworked, lack the expertise required, or be stretched too thin.

​​

4. Poor Communication

• Team Miscommunication: Teams often fail to communicate effectively, leading to misunderstandings, duplicated efforts, or gaps in functionality.

• Silos: Teams working in isolation from one another can miss critical integration points, leading to delays or integration problems down the line.

​​

5. Inadequate Testing

• Skipping Testing Phases: Rushing to release software without adequate testing can result in undetected bugs, security vulnerabilities, or performance issues that harm the product's reputation and usability.

• Not Testing with Real Users: Sometimes, products are tested in artificial conditions or with limited user feedback, leading to unforeseen issues when the product reaches a larger audience.

​​

6. Inexperience/Lack of Expertise

• Unqualified Team Members: If the project is handled by people without the necessary skills or experience, it's more likely to face setbacks and delays.

• Inadequate Leadership: Poor leadership can result in a lack of direction, motivation, and vision, which undermines team productivity and decision-making.

​​

7. Over-ambitious Expectations

• Over-promising: If the scope is too large or the expectations are unrealistic, projects can fail to meet deadlines or deliver quality work. Setting achievable milestones is crucial for steady progress.

• Inadequate Risk Management: Not anticipating risks or setting contingency plans can result in major setbacks when things inevitably don’t go as planned.

​​

8. Poor User Adoption/Resistance to Change

• Failure to Understand the User: If the product doesn’t solve a real problem or isn’t designed with the user experience in mind, users may not adopt it, regardless of how well it functions technically.

• Ignoring User Feedback: Not iterating on the product based on user feedback can lead to a product that fails to meet user expectations.

• User Resistance: Employees may resist using a new system, especially if the software represents a major change in how they work. Without proper training and change management, employees may continue to rely on outdated processes.

• Lack of User Adoption: Even with training, users might not fully embrace the new software due to unfamiliarity, perceived complexity, or dissatisfaction with the software’s interface. If the employees don’t see the value of the COTS software, they might avoid using it altogether.

​​

9. Unrealistic Deadlines

• Rushed Deadlines: Often, projects are given unrealistic deadlines due to external pressures or poor planning, leading to burnout, corner-cutting, and ultimately a subpar product.

• Insufficient Time for Testing: Rushed deadlines can result in insufficient time for proper testing, leading to poor product quality.

​​

10. Poor Implementation and Integration

• Lack of Proper Planning: COTS software often requires careful planning and integration with existing systems. Poor planning, such as underestimating the complexity or not considering the software's fit with existing infrastructure, can result in delays and failures.

• Data Migration Challenges: Migrating data from legacy systems to a COTS solution can be difficult, especially if the software doesn’t support the existing data formats or if there is a lack of compatibility. Inaccurate or incomplete data migration can lead to errors and inefficiencies.

​​

11. Inadequate Training and Support

• Insufficient Training: COTS software, especially complex systems, requires proper training for users. Without sufficient training, employees may struggle to use the software effectively, leading to inefficiencies, errors, or dissatisfaction.

• ​Lack of Ongoing Support: While COTS vendors may provide support, it’s not always sufficient or tailored to the organization’s specific needs. Inadequate or slow support can delay issue resolution and disrupt business operations.​